Model Comparison
Glm 5.2 vs Muse Wonder Full
Glm 5.2 ranks #48 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 118, while Muse Wonder Full ranks #11 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 131. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Glm 5.2Z.ai | Muse Wonder FullMeta | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #48 | #11 |
| IQ | 118 | 131 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 90 | 108 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 123 | 140 |
| Academic Reasoning | 129 | 137 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 127 | 141 |
| Computer Use | 127 | 124 |
| Reliability | 114 | 128 |
| Knowledge Work | 119 | 137 |
| Emotional Reasoning | 116 | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | $7.55 | — |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | $5.80 | — |
| Speed | 92 tok/s | — |
| Context Window | 1M | — |
| Released | 2026-06-13 | 2026-10-12 |
| Open Weights | Yes | No |
More comparisons
- Glm 5.2 vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Glm 5.2 vs Fable 5.1
- Glm 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Glm 5.2 vs Glm 5.3
- Glm 5.2 vs GPT 6 Astra
- Glm 5.2 vs Grok 4.7
- Glm 5.2 vs Kimi K3
- Glm 5.2 vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Glm 5.2 vs Minimax M3
- Glm 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Muse Wonder Full vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Muse Wonder Full vs Fable 5.1
- Muse Wonder Full vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Muse Wonder Full vs Glm 5.3
- Muse Wonder Full vs GPT 6 Astra
- Muse Wonder Full vs Grok 4.7
- All comparisons