Model Comparison
Longcat 2.5 vs Muse Glimmer
Longcat 2.5 ranks #100 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 105, while Muse Glimmer ranks #99 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 106. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Longcat 2.5China (Other) | Muse GlimmerMeta | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #100 | #99 |
| IQ | 105 | 106 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 85 | 88 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 94 | 94 |
| Academic Reasoning | 118 | 119 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 99 | 104 |
| Computer Use | 127 | 113 |
| Reliability | 107 | 112 |
| Knowledge Work | 108 | 109 |
| Emotional Reasoning | — | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | — | $0.56 |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | — | $1.68 |
| Speed | — | 107 tok/s |
| Context Window | — | 128K |
| Released | 2026-11-02 | 2026-08-10 |
| Open Weights | No | Yes |
More comparisons
- Longcat 2.5 vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Longcat 2.5 vs Fable 5.2
- Longcat 2.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Longcat 2.5 vs Glm 5.3
- Longcat 2.5 vs GPT 6 Astra
- Longcat 2.5 vs Grok 4.7
- Longcat 2.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Longcat 2.5 vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Longcat 2.5 vs Minimax M3
- Longcat 2.5 vs Muse Wonder Full
- Longcat 2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Muse Glimmer vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Muse Glimmer vs Fable 5.2
- Muse Glimmer vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Muse Glimmer vs Glm 5.3
- Muse Glimmer vs GPT 6 Astra
- All comparisons