AI IQ
Subscribe

FrontierSWE vs Effective Cost

Archived chart. V1 Dominance retired from Composite IQ and Software Engineering; V2 mean@5 requires a separate calibration.

FrontierSWE vs Effective Cost
FrontierSWE vs Effective Cost
Archived chart. V1 Dominance retired from Composite IQ and Software Engineering; V2 mean@5 requires a separate calibration.
Controls:
FrontierSWE1:1Cost

How to read this chart

Each point is a public model. The chart compares FrontierSWE Dominance against Effective Cost (per 1M I/O Tokens), with color showing the model provider.

Data sources
Artificial AnalysisARC PrizeVals Index v2 Cost per TestVals.aiFrontierSWE
Archived chartProofBench Benchmark ScoresArchived chart. Historical results combine benchmark versions and are excluded from IQ. Use the separately versioned ProofBench 1.1 for current comparisons.Data: Vals.aiOpen chartArchived chartFrontierSWE ScoresArchived chart. V1 Dominance retired from Composite IQ and Software Engineering; V2 mean@5 requires a separate calibration.Data: FrontierSWEOpen chartMore / ExperimentalSWE-Bench Verified Benchmark ScoresHistorical data. Vals archived cohort; retired from default Software Engineering domain. Each model's SWE-Bench Verified score. Color = provider.Data: Vals.ai, LLM StatsOpen chartArchived chartIOI Benchmark ScoresArchived chart. IOI V1 archived; V2 uses a different harness and 2024–2026 tasks.Data: Vals.ai IOIOpen chartMore / ExperimentalTerminal-Bench 2.0 Benchmark ScoresHistorical data. Superseded by 2.1 and 4.0. Legacy Terminal-Bench 2.0 scores retained for historical comparison. Color = provider.Data: Terminal-BenchOpen chartMore / ExperimentalTerminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark ScoresHistorical data. Superseded in Programmatic Reasoning by Terminal-Bench 4.0. Each model's Terminal-Bench 2.1 pass@1 score, using Artificial Analysis as canonical and Vals.ai as fallback. Color = provider.Data: Artificial Analysis Terminal-Bench v2.1, Vals.ai Terminal-Bench 2.1, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.1Open chart