Model Comparison
Fable 5.2 vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Fable 5.2 ranks #1 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 144, while Ling 3.1 Flash ranks #51 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 120. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Fable 5.2Anthropic | Ling 3.1 FlashChina (Other) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #1 | #51 |
| IQ | 144 | 120 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 134 | 102 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 148 | 110 |
| Academic Reasoning | 135 | 131 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 154 | 140 |
| Computer Use | 157 | 113 |
| Reliability | 145 | 118 |
| Knowledge Work | 134 | 124 |
| Emotional Reasoning | — | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | $73.69 | — |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | $48.00 | — |
| Speed | — | 214 tok/s |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Released | 2026-11-09 | 2026-09-30 |
| Open Weights | No | Yes |
More comparisons
- Fable 5.2 vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Fable 5.2 vs Glm 5.3
- Fable 5.2 vs GPT 6 Astra
- Fable 5.2 vs Grok 4.7
- Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Fable 5.2 vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Fable 5.2 vs Minimax M3
- Fable 5.2 vs Muse Wonder Full
- Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Glm 5.3
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT 6 Astra
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- All comparisons