Model Comparison
Gemini 4 Carbon vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Gemini 4 Carbon ranks #5 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 139, while Ling 3.1 Flash ranks #48 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 120. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle | Ling 3.1 FlashChina (Other) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #5 | #48 |
| IQ | 139 | 120 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 120 | 102 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 145 | 110 |
| Academic Reasoning | 136 | 131 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 153 | 140 |
| Computer Use | 155 | 115 |
| Reliability | 135 | 118 |
| Knowledge Work | 130 | 124 |
| Emotional Reasoning | — | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | — | — |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | — | — |
| Speed | — | 214 tok/s |
| Context Window | — | 1M |
| Released | 2026-10-28 | 2026-09-30 |
| Open Weights | No | Yes |
More comparisons
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Fable 5.1
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Glm 5.3
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT 6 Astra
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.7
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Minimax M3
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Wonder Full
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Fable 5.1
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Glm 5.3
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT 6 Astra
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- All comparisons