AnthropicReleased Jul 24, 2026
Proprietary

opus-5

Strongest in Reliability (#6 of 173) and Programmatic Reasoning (#7 of 174); weakest in Academic Reasoning (#12 of 199). All seven dimensions are measured.

Composite IQ ?
135
#8 of 173 ranked models · ahead of 96%
Anthropic's #4 model, behind opus-5.5 (141)
Effective cost
$44.62/1M
$5 in · $25 out
Speed
58tok/s
31s typical response
Context
1Mtokens
1,000,000 tokens in
Evidence
7of 7 dims
32 of 39 benchmarks

IQ profile

Seven dimensions, averaged equally into Composite IQ
Compare shape with
Measured95% range
#1 in dimensionTop-10 median

IQ dimensions

Ranks are among models scored in each dimension. Ranges are model-based estimates, not calibrated confidence intervals.

DimensionIQPosition · 70–160RankEvidencevs Top 10
125measured
#8 / 197
5/5
-2.5
144measured
#8 / 173
4/5
-2
134measured
#12 / 199
5/6
-1
146measured
#7 / 174
4/6
-2.5
137measured
#8 / 173
4/5
-5
132measured
#6 / 173
4/6
-0.5
130measured
#10 / 173
6/6
-1
opus-595% range (model-based, uncalibrated)Top-10 median#1 in dimension100 = average human

Benchmark results

32 of 39 Composite IQ benchmarks have a published result for opus-5. Benchmarks without a result stay listed so gaps are visible.

Abstract Reasoning IQ 125 · measuredBest: #6 of 68 on ARC-AGI-25/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
ARC-AGI-2
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
90.4%
#6 / 68
Leader gpt-6-astra · 95.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Mystery Game Puzzles
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 23
59.0%
#5 / 55
Leader gpt-6-astra · 84.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 23
ARC-AGI-1
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
97.5%
#10 / 68
Leader fable-5 · 98.5%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
ARC-AGI-3
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
30.2%
#4 / 23
Leader gpt-6-astra · 62.7%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Chess Puzzles
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 14
42.0%
#15 / 76
Leader gpt-6-astra · 72.0%
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 14
Mathematical Reasoning IQ 144 · measuredBest: #6 of 61 on MathArena4/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
MathArena
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
70.4%
#6 / 61
Leader gpt-6.1-sol · 84.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
FrontierMath Tier 1-3
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
85.6%
#11 / 83
Leader gpt-6-astra · 93.7%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
FrontierMath Tier 4
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
73.2%
#10 / 71
Leader gpt-6.1-sol · 100%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
ProofBench 1.1
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1.1 · Oct 23
99.0%
#7 / 47
Leader fable-5.1 · 100%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1.1 · Oct 23
Not yet reported
AIME
Academic Reasoning IQ 134 · measuredBest: #6 of 165 on Humanity's Last Exam5/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
54.9%
#6 / 165
Leader opus-5.5 · 61.4%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
CritPt
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
29.1%
#10 / 157
Leader Muse Wonder Full · 32.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
MMMU-Pro
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
84.7%
#9 / 87
Leader fable-5.1 · 90.6%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
93.2%
#16 / 147
Leader gpt-6-astra · 96.1%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
SciCode
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
56.4%
#26 / 165
Leader opus-5.5 · 66.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
Not yet reported
MMLU-Pro
Programmatic Reasoning IQ 146 · measuredBest: #9 of 102 on Terminal-Bench 4.04/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
Terminal-Bench 4.0
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
49.0%
#9 / 102
Leader sonnet-5.5 · 63.6%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
ProgramBench
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
41.5%
#6 / 61
Leader opus-5.5 · 65.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
SWE-rebench
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
63.4%
#3 / 25
Leader fable-5 · 64.5%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
IOI V2
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v2 · Oct 23
84.3%
#8 / 42
Leader Gemini 4 Argon · 100%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v2 · Oct 23
Not yet reported
LiveCodeBenchMirrorCode
Computer Use IQ 137 · measuredBest: #3 of 42 on BrowseComp4/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
BrowseComp
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
90.8%
#3 / 42
Leader gpt-6-astra · 91.5%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
MCP Atlas
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
85.8%
#3 / 32
Leader muse-spark-1.1 · 88.1%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Arena.ai Agent Arena
Arena.ai Agent Arena · Oct 23
8.1
#10 / 64
Leader opus-5.5 · 20.9
Arena.ai Agent Arena · Oct 23
Agents' Last Exam
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
32.2%
#5 / 29
Leader opus-5.5 · 38.2%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Not yet reported
OSWorld-Verified
Reliability IQ 132 · measuredBest: #7 of 156 on AA Omniscience4/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
AA Omniscience
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
37.1
#7 / 156
Leader opus-5.5 · 46.4
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
BullshitBench v2
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
70.0%
#10 / 83
Leader opus-4.8 · 94.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
SimpleQA Verified
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
59.9%
#19 / 79
Leader Gemini 4 Argon · 76.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
AA Long Context Reasoning v1.1
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
79.3%
#56 / 152
Leader kimi-k3 · 88.7%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
Not yet reported
IFBenchFACTS Grounding
Knowledge Work IQ 130 · measuredBest: #6 of 109 on AA-Briefcase v1.1 Elo6/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
AA-Briefcase v1.1 Elo
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
1,658
#6 / 109
Leader sonnet-5.5 · 1,816
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
GDPval-AA v2.1 normalized score
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 20
61.1%
#7 / 124
Leader opus-5.5 · 68.3%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 20
GDP.pdf
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
21.6%
#19 / 104
Leader Muse Wonder Full · 32.6%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
AA-AnalystAgent
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vpass^5-2026-09-29 · Oct 23
53.8%
#7 / 30
Leader gemini-3.7-flash · 60.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vpass^5-2026-09-29 · Oct 23
AutomationBench-AA
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
56.6%
#29 / 104
Leader Gemini 4 Argon · 77.5%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA
Artificial Analysis · Sep 29
47.5%
#7 / 19
Leader fable-5 · 51.1%
Artificial Analysis · Sep 29

Release & availability

Facts from the publisher's announcement and documentation.

Released
Developer
Anthropic
Access
Generally available through the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry, Claude Pro, and Claude Max
Weights
ProprietaryHosted access only
Inputs
textimage
Context
1,000,000 tokens
API price
$5 in · $25 outper 1M tokens · full pricing

What Anthropic says

  • Adaptive thinking is enabled by default, with effort levels from low through max.
  • Anthropic reports the largest gains over Opus 4.8 in deep reasoning, agentic coding, long-horizon tasks, and test-time compute scaling.
  • The model supports a 1M-token context window and up to 128k output tokens.

Limitations

  • Anthropic reports that Opus 5 remains behind Mythos 5 on cybersecurity tasks.
  • When thinking is disabled, Anthropic warns that tool calls or internal XML can occasionally appear in visible text.

Publisher statements, not AI IQ measurements.

About this score

How much of opus-5's IQ is measured, and how the rest is estimated.

32/ 39benchmark results
7/ 7dimensions measured
0estimated
5/5Abstract
4/5Math
5/6Academic
4/6Coding
4/5Computer Use
4/6Reliability
6/6Knowledge Work
Bar height = share of benchmarks with resultsEstimatedNo score
Measured results are shown as published

Every score in the benchmark tables comes from its source unchanged. Composite IQ averages all seven dimensions equally.

How gaps are handled

Every dimension has at least one published result. Missing benchmarks can also draw on its predecessors, Opus 4.8 and Opus 4.7; a predecessor is an estimation input, not evidence that this model has the predecessor's measured results.

A missing result is not a zero

Benchmark versions and evaluation harnesses can differ between sources, so small gaps between models may not be meaningful.

Read the scoring methodology →

Compare opus-5

Side-by-side pages for the models it is most often weighed against.

opus-5Comparison model
Browse all comparisons →

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about opus-5, drawn from the same data as the rest of this page.

How AI IQ scores models →Get this data from the API →
What is the IQ of opus-5?
opus-5 has an estimated IQ of 135, which ranks #8 out of 173 public models on the AI IQ leaderboard. The score combines seven equally weighted reasoning dimensions using measured benchmark results and conservative estimates for missing coverage.
What is opus-5 best at?
Among the dimensions with published benchmark results, opus-5 ranks highest in Reliability (IQ 132, #6 of 173) and Programmatic Reasoning (IQ 146, #7 of 174). Its lowest-ranked measured dimension is Academic Reasoning (IQ 134, #12 of 199).
What is the EQ of opus-5?
opus-5 has an estimated EQ of 139. EQ measures emotional reasoning — how well a model reads and responds to emotional context — and is scored separately from IQ.
Which benchmarks has opus-5 been tested on?
opus-5 has published results on 32 of the 39 benchmarks behind AI IQ's Composite IQ, including Humanity's Last Exam, AA Omniscience, AA-Briefcase v1.1 Elo, GDPval-AA v2.1 normalized score and CritPt.
How much does opus-5 cost?
opus-5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens. Adjusted for how many tokens it actually consumes on real tasks, its effective cost works out to $44.62 per million input-plus-output tokens.
Is opus-5 open source?
No — opus-5 is a proprietary model. Its weights are not publicly available, so it is used through hosted APIs and products.
Who developed opus-5?
opus-5 was developed by Anthropic, based in the United States.
When was opus-5 released?
opus-5 was publicly released on July 24, 2026.
How large is the context window of opus-5?
opus-5 supports a context window of 1,000,000 tokens — the amount of text it can consider in a single request.
How fast is opus-5?
In independent measurements, opus-5 generates about 58 tokens per second, with a typical response time of about 31 seconds.