Z.aiReleased Feb 11, 2026
Open weights

glm-5

Strongest in Computer Use (#54 of 176) and Programmatic Reasoning (#69 of 177); weakest in Abstract Reasoning (#170 of 201). Knowledge Work is estimated, because no results are published yet.

Composite IQ ?
106
#94 of 176 ranked models · ahead of 47%
Z.ai's #5 model, behind GLM-5.3 (124)
Effective cost
$6.38/1M
$1 in · $3.20 out
Speed
71tok/s
53s typical response
Context
Unverified
Not in publisher docs
Evidence
6of 7 dims
18 of 39 benchmarks

IQ profile

Seven dimensions, averaged equally into Composite IQ
Compare shape with
100 avg human130160● Abstract77#170● Math105#106● Academic120#103● Coding116#69● Computer Use120#54● Reliability113#85● Knowledge Work94#140 · est.
MeasuredEstimated95% range
#1 in dimensionTop-10 median

IQ dimensions

Ranks are among models scored in each dimension. Ranges are model-based estimates, not calibrated confidence intervals.

DimensionIQPosition · 70–160RankEvidencevs Top 10
77measured
#170 / 201
3/5
-49.5
105measured
#106 / 176
4/5
-42
120measured
#103 / 203
5/6
-15.5
116measured
#69 / 177
1/6
-33.5
120measured
#54 / 176
1/5
-23
113measured
#85 / 177
4/6
-21
94estimated
#140 / 176
0/6
-37.5
glm-595% range (model-based, uncalibrated)Top-10 median#1 in dimension100 = average human

Benchmark results

18 of 39 Composite IQ benchmarks have a published result for glm-5. Benchmarks without a result stay listed so gaps are visible.

Abstract Reasoning IQ 77 · measuredBest: #56 of 68 on ARC-AGI-23/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
ARC-AGI-2
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
4.9%
#56 / 68
Leader gpt-6-astra · 95.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
ARC-AGI-1
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
44.7%
#57 / 68
Leader fable-5 · 98.5%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Chess Puzzles
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 15
10.0%
#70 / 76
Leader gpt-6-astra · 72.0%
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 15
Not yet reported
ARC-AGI-3Mystery Game Puzzles
Mathematical Reasoning IQ 105 · measuredBest: #22 of 56 on AIME4/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
91.7%
#22 / 56
Leader gemini-3.1-pro · 98.1%
MathArena
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 28
19.5%
#42 / 64
Leader gpt-6.1-sol · 84.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 28
FrontierMath Tier 4
Epoch AI FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 · Sep 22
2.1%
#65 / 72
Leader gpt-6.1-sol · 100%
Epoch AI FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 · Sep 22
FrontierMath Tier 1-3
Epoch AI FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 · Sep 22
16.4%
#76 / 84
Leader gpt-6-astra · 93.7%
Epoch AI FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 · Sep 22
Not yet reported
ProofBench 1.1
Academic Reasoning IQ 120 · measuredBest: #18 of 45 on MMLU-Pro5/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
MMLU-Pro
TIGER-Lab MMLU-Pro leaderboard (missing rows only) · Sep 22
86.0%
#18 / 45
Leader fable-5.1 · 92.4%
TIGER-Lab MMLU-Pro leaderboard (missing rows only) · Sep 22
SciCode
Artificial Analysis model leaderboard · Sep 10
46.2%
#85 / 167
Leader opus-5.5 · 66.9%
Artificial Analysis model leaderboard · Sep 10
Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
29.3%
#90 / 167
Leader opus-5.5 · 61.4%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
82.0%
#96 / 147
Leader gpt-6-astra · 96.1%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
CritPt
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
2.0%
#104 / 159
Leader Muse Wonder Full · 32.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
Not yet reported
MMMU-Pro
Programmatic Reasoning IQ 116 · measuredBest: #31 of 61 on LiveCodeBench1/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
LiveCodeBench
Vals.ai · Aug 4
81.9%
#31 / 61
Leader Fugu Ultra v1.0 · 93.2%
Vals.ai · Aug 4
Not yet reported
IOI V2Terminal-Bench 4.0ProgramBenchSWE-rebenchMirrorCode
Computer Use IQ 120 · measuredBest: #25 of 43 on BrowseComp1/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
BrowseComp
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
75.9%
#25 / 43
Leader Kimi K3.1 Pro · 92.1%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Not yet reported
OSWorld-VerifiedMCP AtlasArena.ai Agent ArenaAgents' Last Exam
Reliability IQ 113 · measuredBest: #37 of 96 on IFBench4/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
IFBench
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
72.3%
#37 / 96
Leader minimax-m3 · 82.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
AA Omniscience
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
0.3
#71 / 158
Leader opus-5.5 · 46.4
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
AA Long Context Reasoning v1.1
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
75.7%
#86 / 154
Leader kimi-k3 · 88.7%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
BullshitBench v2
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
28.0%
#57 / 83
Leader opus-4.8 · 94.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Not yet reported
SimpleQA VerifiedFACTS Grounding
Knowledge Work IQ 94 · estimatedNo published results0/6
No published results yet for Knowledge Work. The 94 shown is estimated from glm-5's other dimensions and will be replaced as results come in. How estimates work
AA-Briefcase v1.1GDPval-AA v2.1AutomationBench-AAGDP.pdfAA-AnalystAgentEnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Release & availability

Release details on record for this model.

Released
Developer
Z.ai
Weights
Open weightsDownloadable and self-hostable
API price
$1 in · $3.20 outper 1M tokens · full pricing

About this score

How much of glm-5's IQ is measured, and how the rest is estimated.

18/ 39benchmark results
6/ 7dimensions measured
1estimated
3/5Abstract
4/5Math
5/6Academic
1/6Coding
1/5Computer Use
4/6Reliability
0/6Knowledge Work
Bar height = share of benchmarks with resultsEstimatedNo score
Measured results are shown as published

Every score in the benchmark tables comes from its source unchanged. Composite IQ averages all seven dimensions equally.

Estimates fill the gaps

Knowledge Work has no published results yet, so its IQ is estimated from glm-5's other dimensions.

A missing result is not a zero

Benchmark versions and evaluation harnesses can differ between sources, so small gaps between models may not be meaningful.

Read the scoring methodology →

Compare glm-5

Side-by-side pages for the models it is most often weighed against.

glm-5Comparison model
Browse all comparisons →

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about glm-5, drawn from the same data as the rest of this page.

How AI IQ scores models →Get this data from the API →
What is the IQ of glm-5?
glm-5 has an estimated IQ of 106, which ranks #94 out of 176 public models on the AI IQ leaderboard. The score combines seven equally weighted reasoning dimensions using measured benchmark results and conservative estimates for missing coverage.
What is glm-5 best at?
Among the dimensions with published benchmark results, glm-5 ranks highest in Computer Use (IQ 120, #54 of 176) and Programmatic Reasoning (IQ 116, #69 of 177). Its lowest-ranked measured dimension is Abstract Reasoning (IQ 77, #170 of 201).
What is the EQ of glm-5?
glm-5 has an estimated EQ of 115. EQ measures emotional reasoning — how well a model reads and responds to emotional context — and is scored separately from IQ.
Which benchmarks has glm-5 been tested on?
glm-5 has published results on 18 of the 39 benchmarks behind AI IQ's Composite IQ, including IFBench, AIME, MMLU-Pro, AA Omniscience and LiveCodeBench.
How much does glm-5 cost?
glm-5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens. Adjusted for how many tokens it actually consumes on real tasks, its effective cost works out to $6.38 per million input-plus-output tokens.
Is glm-5 open source?
Yes — glm-5 is an open-weights model: its trained weights are published, so it can be downloaded and self-hosted.
Who developed glm-5?
glm-5 was developed by Z.ai, based in China.
When was glm-5 released?
glm-5 was publicly released on February 11, 2026.
How large is the context window of glm-5?
AI IQ hasn't verified an input context limit for glm-5 from its developer's documentation, so none is listed rather than guessing.
How fast is glm-5?
In independent measurements, glm-5 generates about 71 tokens per second, with a typical response time of about 53 seconds.