OpenAI

GPT 6 Luna API Pricing

GPT 6 Luna has tracked API rates of $0.1 per 1M input tokens and $0.5 per 1M output tokens. Cached input is billed at $0.01 per 1M tokens. Rates are in USD from the AI IQ dataset; see the GPT 6 Luna model profile for capability scores.

Input / 1M
$0.1
Output / 1M
$0.5
Effective / 1M I/O
$0.7684
Cost Rank
#34

Price List

RatePrice (USD)Notes
Input$0.1per 1M tokens
Output$0.5per 1M tokens
Cached input (read)$0.01per 1M tokens
Cache write$0.125per 1M tokens
Blended input + output$0.61M in + 1M out at list price
Context window1.05M tokens

Pricing References and Billing Caveats

These are the tracked rates, not a live quote. Hosted-provider choice, region, long-context tiers, caching, batch discounts, and temporary promotions can change the actual bill. Open-weight availability does not mean hosted inference is free. Workload examples assume the listed standard input and output rates, with no cache hits or discounts.

OpenAI pricing catalog — check current offerings and rate tiers. This catalog may not list historical models or third-party hosted endpoints.

Publisher-reported pricing notes

  • Lower standard API token prices than its GPT-5.6 predecessor.
  • Prompts above 272K input tokens incur higher rates.

Official release and model references

These references document the model and its release; not every reference is a pricing table. Confirm the applicable endpoint and billing tier with your inference provider before purchase.

What a Workload Costs

Computed straight from the list prices above — token counts are illustrative workload sizes, not measurements of GPT 6 Luna.

WorkloadCostTokens
Short chat turn$0.000351K in / 500 out
Summarize a long document$0.011100K in / 2K out
Agentic coding session$0.100500K in / 100K out
1M input + 1M output tokens$0.6001M in / 1M out

Effective Cost

In AI IQ's scoring, GPT 6 Luna's list price is adjusted by a token-usage multiplier of 1.281 (measured from real benchmark runs), giving an effective cost of $0.7684 per 1M input + output tokens. That places it #34 of 156 models on the effective-cost ranking (lower is cheaper). Some models spend far more tokens than others on the same task, so effective cost compares what a unit of work really costs. Method details are on the methodology page; see all models on the cost charts and the falling cost of intelligence over time.

Compare