Model Comparison
Doubao Seed Code vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Doubao Seed Code ranks #119 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 101, while Ling 3.1 Flash ranks #48 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 120. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Doubao Seed CodeChina (Other) | Ling 3.1 FlashChina (Other) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #119 | #48 |
| IQ | 101 | 120 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 77 | 102 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 106 | 110 |
| Academic Reasoning | 110 | 131 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 113 | 140 |
| Computer Use | 101 | 115 |
| Reliability | 106 | 118 |
| Knowledge Work | 95 | 124 |
| Emotional Reasoning | — | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | — | — |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | $0.00 | — |
| Speed | — | 214 tok/s |
| Context Window | 256K | 1M |
| Released | — | 2026-09-30 |
| Open Weights | No | Yes |
More comparisons
- Doubao Seed Code vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Doubao Seed Code vs Fable 5.1
- Doubao Seed Code vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Doubao Seed Code vs Glm 5.3
- Doubao Seed Code vs GPT 6 Astra
- Doubao Seed Code vs Grok 4.7
- Doubao Seed Code vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Doubao Seed Code vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Doubao Seed Code vs Minimax M3
- Doubao Seed Code vs Muse Wonder Full
- Doubao Seed Code vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Fable 5.1
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Glm 5.3
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT 6 Astra
- All comparisons