Model Comparison
Fable 5.1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Fable 5.1 ranks #4 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 138, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ranks #103 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 102. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Fable 5.1Anthropic | Ling 3.0 Flash FinChina (Other) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #4 | #103 |
| IQ | 138 | 102 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 124 | 88 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 149 | 93 |
| Academic Reasoning | 137 | 120 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 147 | 101 |
| Computer Use | 142 | 97 |
| Reliability | 136 | 112 |
| Knowledge Work | 133 | 106 |
| Emotional Reasoning | — | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | $89.32 | — |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | $60.00 | — |
| Speed | 61 tok/s | 338 tok/s |
| Context Window | 1M | 262K |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-08-27 |
| Open Weights | No | Yes |
More comparisons
- Fable 5.1 vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Fable 5.1 vs Glm 5.3
- Fable 5.1 vs GPT 6 Astra
- Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7
- Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3
- Fable 5.1 vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Fable 5.1 vs Minimax M3
- Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Glm 5.3
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT 6 Astra
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Grok 4.7
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Kimi K3
- All comparisons