AnthropicReleased Jun 9, 2026
Proprietary

fable-5

Strongest in Academic Reasoning (#11 of 203) and Reliability (#10 of 177); weakest in Knowledge Work (#15 of 176). All seven dimensions are measured.

Composite IQ ?
133
#12 of 176 ranked models · ahead of 94%
Anthropic's #5 model, behind opus-5.5 (141)
Effective cost
$87.20/1M
$10 in · $50 out
Speed
69tok/s
109s typical response
Context
1Mtokens
1,000,000 tokens in
Evidence
7of 7 dims
34 of 39 benchmarks

IQ profile

Seven dimensions, averaged equally into Composite IQ
Compare shape with
100 avg human130160● Abstract122#12● Math143#11● Academic134#11● Coding141#14● Computer Use134#12● Reliability129#10● Knowledge Work129#15
Measured95% range
#1 in dimensionTop-10 median

IQ dimensions

Ranks are among models scored in each dimension. Ranges are model-based estimates, not calibrated confidence intervals.

DimensionIQPosition · 70–160RankEvidencevs Top 10
122measured
#12 / 201
4/5
-4.5
143measured
#11 / 176
4/5
-4
134measured
#11 / 203
6/6
-1.5
141measured
#14 / 177
5/6
-8.5
134measured
#12 / 176
4/5
-9
129measured
#10 / 177
5/6
-5
129measured
#15 / 176
6/6
-2.5
fable-595% range (model-based, uncalibrated)Top-10 median#1 in dimension100 = average human

Benchmark results

34 of 39 Composite IQ benchmarks have a published result for fable-5. Benchmarks without a result stay listed so gaps are visible.

Abstract Reasoning IQ 122 · measuredBest: #1 of 68 on ARC-AGI-14/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
ARC-AGI-1
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
98.5%
#1 / 68
Leader on this benchmark
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
ARC-AGI-2
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
89.2%
#9 / 68
Leader gpt-6-astra · 95.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Mystery Game Puzzles
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 23
52.0%
#10 / 55
Leader gpt-6-astra · 84.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 23
Chess Puzzles
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 14
41.0%
#16 / 76
Leader gpt-6-astra · 72.0%
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 14
Not yet reported
ARC-AGI-3
Mathematical Reasoning IQ 143 · measuredBest: #5 of 72 on FrontierMath Tier 44/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
FrontierMath Tier 4
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
90.2%
#5 / 72
Leader gpt-6.1-sol · 100%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
FrontierMath Tier 1-3
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
87.0%
#9 / 84
Leader gpt-6-astra · 93.7%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
ProofBench 1.1
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1.1 · Oct 27
95.0%
#8 / 48
Leader fable-5.1 · 100%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1.1 · Oct 27
MathArena
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 28
50.9%
#15 / 64
Leader gpt-6.1-sol · 84.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 28
Not yet reported
AIME
Academic Reasoning IQ 134 · measuredBest: #2 of 89 on MMMU-Pro6/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
MMMU-Pro
Artificial Analysis model leaderboard · Sep 6
89.3%
#2 / 89
Leader fable-5.1 · 90.6%
Artificial Analysis model leaderboard · Sep 6
Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
55.5%
#4 / 167
Leader opus-5.5 · 61.4%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
SciCode
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
61.0%
#5 / 167
Leader opus-5.5 · 66.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
MMLU-Pro
TIGER-Lab MMLU-Pro leaderboard (missing rows only) · Sep 22
91.5%
#2 / 45
Leader fable-5.1 · 92.4%
TIGER-Lab MMLU-Pro leaderboard (missing rows only) · Sep 22
CritPt
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
28.6%
#11 / 159
Leader Muse Wonder Full · 32.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
92.6%
#23 / 147
Leader gpt-6-astra · 96.1%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
Programmatic Reasoning IQ 141 · measuredBest: #1 of 25 on SWE-rebench5/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
SWE-rebench
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
64.5%
#1 / 25
Leader on this benchmark
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
LiveCodeBench
Vals.ai · Aug 4
89.8%
#4 / 61
Leader Fugu Ultra v1.0 · 93.2%
Vals.ai · Aug 4
Terminal-Bench 4.0
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
42.4%
#13 / 104
Leader Kimi K3.1 Pro · 67.2%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
ProgramBench
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
33.0%
#8 / 61
Leader opus-5.5 · 65.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
MirrorCode
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vML,+Private,2L · Oct 23
63.9%
#3 / 9
Leader opus-5.5 · 78.9%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vML,+Private,2L · Oct 23
Not yet reported
IOI V2
Computer Use IQ 134 · measuredBest: #1 of 24 on OSWorld-Verified4/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
OSWorld-Verified
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
85.0%
#1 / 24
Leader on this benchmark
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Arena.ai Agent Arena
Arena.ai Agent Arena · Oct 26
8.0
#11 / 70
Leader opus-5.5 · 20.9
Arena.ai Agent Arena · Oct 26
MCP Atlas
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
83.3%
#7 / 32
Leader muse-spark-1.1 · 88.1%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Agents' Last Exam
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
25.7%
#13 / 29
Leader opus-5.5 · 38.2%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Not yet reported
BrowseComp
Reliability IQ 129 · measuredBest: #4 of 158 on AA Omniscience5/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
AA Omniscience
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
43.3
#4 / 158
Leader opus-5.5 · 46.4
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
SimpleQA Verified
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
70.7%
#8 / 80
Leader Gemini 4 Argon · 76.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
AA Long Context Reasoning v1.1
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
82.3%
#28 / 154
Leader kimi-k3 · 88.7%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
BullshitBench v2
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
56.0%
#27 / 83
Leader opus-4.8 · 94.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
IFBench
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
63.5%
#63 / 96
Leader minimax-m3 · 82.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
Not yet reported
FACTS Grounding
Knowledge Work IQ 129 · measuredBest: #1 of 31 on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA6/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1117-task-strict-2026-09-29 · Oct 27
51.1%
#1 / 31
Leader on this benchmark
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1117-task-strict-2026-09-29 · Oct 27
GDP.pdf
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
24.0%
#13 / 106
Leader Muse Wonder Full · 32.6%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
AA-Briefcase v1.1 Elo
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
1,537
#16 / 111
Leader sonnet-5.5 · 1,812
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
GDPval-AA v2.1 normalized score
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 20
55.5%
#19 / 124
Leader opus-5.5 · 68.3%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 20
AA-AnalystAgent
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vpass^5-2026-09-29 · Oct 27
48.8%
#11 / 35
Leader gemini-3.7-flash · 60.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vpass^5-2026-09-29 · Oct 27
AutomationBench-AA
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
54.1%
#34 / 106
Leader Gemini 4 Argon · 77.5%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27

Release & availability

Release details on record for this model.

Released
Developer
Anthropic
Weights
ProprietaryHosted access only
Context
1,000,000 tokens
API price
$10 in · $50 outper 1M tokens · full pricing

About this score

How much of fable-5's IQ is measured, and how the rest is estimated.

34/ 39benchmark results
7/ 7dimensions measured
0estimated
4/5Abstract
4/5Math
6/6Academic
5/6Coding
4/5Computer Use
5/6Reliability
6/6Knowledge Work
Bar height = share of benchmarks with resultsEstimatedNo score
Measured results are shown as published

Every score in the benchmark tables comes from its source unchanged. Composite IQ averages all seven dimensions equally.

How gaps are handled

Every dimension has at least one published result.

A missing result is not a zero

Benchmark versions and evaluation harnesses can differ between sources, so small gaps between models may not be meaningful.

Read the scoring methodology →

Compare fable-5

Side-by-side pages for the models it is most often weighed against.

fable-5Comparison model
Browse all comparisons →

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about fable-5, drawn from the same data as the rest of this page.

How AI IQ scores models →Get this data from the API →
What is the IQ of fable-5?
fable-5 has an estimated IQ of 133, which ranks #12 out of 176 public models on the AI IQ leaderboard. The score combines seven equally weighted reasoning dimensions using measured benchmark results and conservative estimates for missing coverage.
What is fable-5 best at?
Among the dimensions with published benchmark results, fable-5 ranks highest in Academic Reasoning (IQ 134, #11 of 203) and Reliability (IQ 129, #10 of 177). Its lowest-ranked measured dimension is Knowledge Work (IQ 129, #15 of 176).
What is the EQ of fable-5?
fable-5 has an estimated EQ of 128. EQ measures emotional reasoning — how well a model reads and responds to emotional context — and is scored separately from IQ.
Which benchmarks has fable-5 been tested on?
fable-5 has published results on 34 of the 39 benchmarks behind AI IQ's Composite IQ, including ARC-AGI-1, MMMU-Pro, Humanity's Last Exam, AA Omniscience and SciCode.
How much does fable-5 cost?
fable-5 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens. Adjusted for how many tokens it actually consumes on real tasks, its effective cost works out to $87.20 per million input-plus-output tokens.
Is fable-5 open source?
No — fable-5 is a proprietary model. Its weights are not publicly available, so it is used through hosted APIs and products.
Who developed fable-5?
fable-5 was developed by Anthropic, based in the United States.
When was fable-5 released?
fable-5 was publicly released on June 9, 2026.
How large is the context window of fable-5?
fable-5 supports a context window of 1,000,000 tokens — the amount of text it can consider in a single request.
How fast is fable-5?
In independent measurements, fable-5 generates about 69 tokens per second, with a typical response time of about 109 seconds.