Model Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ranks #102 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 104, while Ling 3.0 Flash ranks #105 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 104. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle | Ling 3.0 FlashChina (Other) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #102 | #105 |
| IQ | 104 | 104 |
| Abstract Reasoning | 93 | 85 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 105 | 94 |
| Academic Reasoning | 116 | 117 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 92 | 99 |
| Computer Use | 108 | 117 |
| Reliability | 112 | 111 |
| Knowledge Work | 101 | 108 |
| Emotional Reasoning | — | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | $0.43 | $0.33 |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | $1.75 | $0.29 |
| Speed | 366 tok/s | 245 tok/s |
| Context Window | 1M | 262K |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2026-07-24 |
| Open Weights | No | Yes |
More comparisons
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Fable 5.1
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Glm 5.3
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT 6 Astra
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.7
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Minimax M3
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Muse Wonder Full
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Ling 3.0 Flash vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Ling 3.0 Flash vs Fable 5.1
- Ling 3.0 Flash vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Ling 3.0 Flash vs Glm 5.3
- Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT 6 Astra
- All comparisons