Model Comparison
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nanbeige 4.3 33b
Ling 3.1 Flash ranks #51 on the AI IQ leaderboard with an estimated IQ of 120, while Nanbeige 4.3 33b does not yet have a derived IQ. The table below puts the two models side by side across the seven capability dimensions, emotional reasoning, cost, speed, and context window.
Where They Sit on the IQ Bell Curve
Both models highlighted on the standard normal IQ distribution of every tracked model
| Ling 3.1 FlashChina (Other) | Nanbeige 4.3 33bChina (Other) | |
|---|---|---|
| Rank | #51 | — |
| IQ | 120 | — |
| Abstract Reasoning | 102 | 99 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 110 | — |
| Academic Reasoning | 131 | 100 |
| Programmatic Reasoning | 140 | — |
| Computer Use | 113 | — |
| Reliability | 118 | — |
| Knowledge Work | 124 | — |
| Emotional Reasoning | — | — |
| Effective Cost / 1M Tokens | — | — |
| Sticker Price / 1M I/O Tokens | — | — |
| Speed | 214 tok/s | — |
| Context Window | 1M | 524K |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-25 |
| Open Weights | Yes | Yes |
More comparisons
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Fable 5.2
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Glm 5.3
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT 6 Astra
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mimo V2.6 Pro
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Minimax M3
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Wonder Full
- Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Nanbeige 4.3 33b vs Deepseek V4 Pro
- Nanbeige 4.3 33b vs Fable 5.2
- Nanbeige 4.3 33b vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Nanbeige 4.3 33b vs Glm 5.3
- Nanbeige 4.3 33b vs GPT 6 Astra
- All comparisons