AlibabaReleased Jun 2, 2026
Proprietary

qwen3.7-plus

Strongest in Academic Reasoning (#69 of 203) and Reliability (#61 of 177); weakest in Programmatic Reasoning (#104 of 177). All seven dimensions are measured.

Composite IQ ?
112
#71 of 176 ranked models · ahead of 60%
Alibaba's #8 model, behind Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (125)
Effective cost
$1.44/1M
$0.40 in · $1.60 out
Speed
57tok/s
46s typical response
Context
1Mtokens
1,000,000 tokens in
Evidence
7of 7 dims
19 of 39 benchmarks

IQ profile

Seven dimensions, averaged equally into Composite IQ
Compare shape with
100 avg human130160● Abstract94#84● Math114#78● Academic126#69● Coding106#104● Computer Use112#83● Reliability117#61● Knowledge Work113#68
Measured95% range
#1 in dimensionTop-10 median

IQ dimensions

Ranks are among models scored in each dimension. Ranges are model-based estimates, not calibrated confidence intervals.

DimensionIQPosition · 70–160RankEvidencevs Top 10
94measured
#84 / 201
2/5
-32.5
114measured
#78 / 176
1/5
-33
126measured
#69 / 203
5/6
-9.5
106measured
#104 / 177
1/6
-43.5
112measured
#83 / 176
2/5
-31
117measured
#61 / 177
3/6
-17
113measured
#68 / 176
5/6
-18.5
qwen3.7-plus95% range (model-based, uncalibrated)Top-10 median#1 in dimension100 = average human

Benchmark results

19 of 39 Composite IQ benchmarks have a published result for qwen3.7-plus. Benchmarks without a result stay listed so gaps are visible.

Abstract Reasoning IQ 94 · measuredBest: #44 of 76 on Chess Puzzles2/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
Chess Puzzles
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 15
24.0%
#44 / 76
Leader gpt-6-astra · 72.0%
Epoch AI vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 15
Mystery Game Puzzles
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 23
17.0%
#45 / 55
Leader gpt-6-astra · 84.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation vEpoch 100-position leaderboard (task implementation versions recorded per run) · Oct 23
Not yet reported
ARC-AGI-3ARC-AGI-2ARC-AGI-1
Mathematical Reasoning IQ 114 · measuredBest: #60 of 84 on FrontierMath Tier 1-31/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
FrontierMath Tier 1-3
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
34.4%
#60 / 84
Leader gpt-6-astra · 93.7%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Not yet reported
FrontierMath Tier 4ProofBench 1.1MathArenaAIME
Academic Reasoning IQ 126 · measuredBest: #24 of 89 on MMMU-Pro5/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
MMMU-Pro
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
80.5%
#24 / 89
Leader fable-5.1 · 90.6%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
90.0%
#47 / 147
Leader gpt-6-astra · 96.1%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
35.6%
#66 / 167
Leader opus-5.5 · 61.4%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
CritPt
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
9.1%
#67 / 159
Leader Muse Wonder Full · 32.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
SciCode
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
46.1%
#86 / 167
Leader opus-5.5 · 66.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
Not yet reported
MMLU-Pro
Programmatic Reasoning IQ 106 · measuredBest: #61 of 104 on Terminal-Bench 4.01/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
Terminal-Bench 4.0
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
1.0%
#61 / 104
Leader Kimi K3.1 Pro · 67.2%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
Not yet reported
LiveCodeBenchIOI V2ProgramBenchSWE-rebenchMirrorCode
Computer Use IQ 112 · measuredBest: #15 of 24 on OSWorld-Verified2/5
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
OSWorld-Verified
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
73.3%
#15 / 24
Leader fable-5 · 85.0%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation · Oct 23
Arena.ai Agent Arena
Arena.ai Agent Arena · Oct 26
-7.4
#56 / 70
Leader opus-5.5 · 20.9
Arena.ai Agent Arena · Oct 26
Not yet reported
BrowseCompMCP AtlasAgents' Last Exam
Reliability IQ 117 · measuredBest: #11 of 96 on IFBench3/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
IFBench
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
78.0%
#11 / 96
Leader minimax-m3 · 82.9%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
AA Omniscience
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
1.1
#65 / 158
Leader opus-5.5 · 46.4
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
AA Long Context Reasoning v1.1
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
73.0%
#100 / 154
Leader kimi-k3 · 88.7%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
Not yet reported
SimpleQA VerifiedBullshitBench v2FACTS Grounding
Knowledge Work IQ 113 · measuredBest: #51 of 106 on GDP.pdf5/6
BenchmarkScorePercentileRankLeader · source
GDP.pdf
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
12.2%
#51 / 106
Leader Muse Wonder Full · 32.6%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
AA-Briefcase v1.1 Elo
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
914
#59 / 111
Leader sonnet-5.5 · 1,812
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
AutomationBench-AA
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
17.4%
#62 / 106
Leader Gemini 4 Argon · 77.5%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 27
GDPval-AA v2.1 normalized score
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
13.2%
#91 / 124
Leader opus-5.5 · 68.3%
Artificial Analysis v4.3.2 · Oct 23
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1117-task-strict-2026-09-29 · Oct 27
40.6%
#24 / 31
Leader fable-5 · 51.1%
Full source leaderboard reconciliation v1117-task-strict-2026-09-29 · Oct 27
Not yet reported
AA-AnalystAgent

Release & availability

Release details on record for this model.

Released
Developer
Alibaba
Weights
ProprietaryHosted access only
Context
1,000,000 tokens
API price
$0.40 in · $1.60 outper 1M tokens · full pricing

About this score

How much of qwen3.7-plus's IQ is measured, and how the rest is estimated.

19/ 39benchmark results
7/ 7dimensions measured
0estimated
2/5Abstract
1/5Math
5/6Academic
1/6Coding
2/5Computer Use
3/6Reliability
5/6Knowledge Work
Bar height = share of benchmarks with resultsEstimatedNo score
Measured results are shown as published

Every score in the benchmark tables comes from its source unchanged. Composite IQ averages all seven dimensions equally.

How gaps are handled

Every dimension has at least one published result. Missing benchmarks can also draw on its predecessor, Qwen3.6 Plus; a predecessor is an estimation input, not evidence that this model has the predecessor's measured results.

A missing result is not a zero

Benchmark versions and evaluation harnesses can differ between sources, so small gaps between models may not be meaningful.

Read the scoring methodology →

Compare qwen3.7-plus

Side-by-side pages for the models it is most often weighed against.

qwen3.7-plusComparison model
Browse all comparisons →

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers about qwen3.7-plus, drawn from the same data as the rest of this page.

How AI IQ scores models →Get this data from the API →
What is the IQ of qwen3.7-plus?
qwen3.7-plus has an estimated IQ of 112, which ranks #71 out of 176 public models on the AI IQ leaderboard. The score combines seven equally weighted reasoning dimensions using measured benchmark results and conservative estimates for missing coverage.
What is qwen3.7-plus best at?
Among the dimensions with published benchmark results, qwen3.7-plus ranks highest in Academic Reasoning (IQ 126, #69 of 203) and Reliability (IQ 117, #61 of 177). Its lowest-ranked measured dimension is Programmatic Reasoning (IQ 106, #104 of 177).
What is the EQ of qwen3.7-plus?
qwen3.7-plus doesn't have an EQ score yet. EQ (emotional reasoning) is calculated from EQ-Bench 4 and AttuneBench, and neither has published a result for qwen3.7-plus. AI IQ doesn't estimate EQ from other benchmarks, so the score appears once one of those results is published.
Which benchmarks has qwen3.7-plus been tested on?
qwen3.7-plus has published results on 19 of the 39 benchmarks behind AI IQ's Composite IQ, including IFBench, MMMU-Pro, GPQA Diamond, Humanity's Last Exam and AA Omniscience.
How much does qwen3.7-plus cost?
qwen3.7-plus costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens. Adjusted for how many tokens it actually consumes on real tasks, its effective cost works out to $1.44 per million input-plus-output tokens.
Is qwen3.7-plus open source?
No — qwen3.7-plus is a proprietary model. Its weights are not publicly available, so it is used through hosted APIs and products.
Who developed qwen3.7-plus?
qwen3.7-plus was developed by Alibaba, based in China.
When was qwen3.7-plus released?
qwen3.7-plus was publicly released on June 2, 2026.
How large is the context window of qwen3.7-plus?
qwen3.7-plus supports a context window of 1,000,000 tokens — the amount of text it can consider in a single request.
How fast is qwen3.7-plus?
In independent measurements, qwen3.7-plus generates about 57 tokens per second, with a typical response time of about 46 seconds.